Pancasila and Citizenship Education
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Pancasila and Citizenship Education by Author "Amin M"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A Comparative Study Of The Use Of Learning Model Jigsaw Type And Stad Type Toward The Second Year Students’ Learning Result Of Civics Education Of Mts Hidayatul Mutaallim Kepulauan Meranti Regency(2013-08-29) Amin MThe purpose of this research is to compare the use of Jigsaw learning technique with STAD learning technique, which one is more effective toward the second year students’ result of Civics Education of MTs Hidayatul Mutaalim Kepulauan Meranti regency. This research is a comparative study, comparing two learning models (Jigsaw and STAD) to know which one is more effective to be applied into Civics Education subject. The samples of this research are all of the second year students of MTs Hidayatul Mutaalim 2013 Academic year. There are two classes. Each class consists of 30 students. One class is taught by using Jigsaw technique and the other is using STAD technique. Before given treatment, the students are given a pre test and after treatment they are given a post test with the same questions, amount of questions, and time. The data collection technique is done by analyzing the students’ result of post test to know weather there is a significant different learning result or not between the students taught by using Jigsaw technique and using STAD technique. The data are analyzed by using t-test formula with determination when the t-count ≥ t-table, it means that there is a different learning result. On the contrary, when the t-count ≤ t-table, it means that there is not a significant different learning result. The result of data calculation, the value of t-test shows that the value of t-count = 12.09 and t-table = 1.67. Therefore, there is difference of the students’ learning result between taught by using Jigsaw technique and STAD technique. Beside, the average score of the two classes shows that Jigsaw technique is more effective than STAD one and the comparative score is 17:12.