Analisis Putusan Yuridis Informasi Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah dalam Kasus Prita Mulyasari
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2012-12-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The sophistication of Internet technology to penetrate the boundaries of
time and distance, so the physical boundaries of the state is no longer a barrier to
communication and interaction of the various interests of the community. The
ability of the Internet has changed the way of thinking, interacting and act also
impacts the law. The law is usually based on something real (physical) but the
Internet has changed the real thing into something that is electronic, like send a
letter via e-mail. This means requires a broad understanding of the evidence in
the trial. However, although the arrangement of the power of e-mail in the trial
process but clearly there is no evidence in the form of electronic data in the form
of e-mail has been recognized. A case in point is the case of Prita Mulyasari
against The RS OMNI INTERNATIONAL, in which case began when Prita
Mulyasari write an e-mail or electronic mail containing complaints about the
service The RS Pritchard OMNI INTERNATIONAL scattered to various mailing
lists that result from it Party RS OMNI INTERNATIONAL felt aggrieved and
suing Prita Mulyasari the Civil Code to the Tangerang District Court.
From the results of this study, there are three main things that can be
inferred. First, that the position / existence of an electronic information as valid
evidence in the case of Prita Mulyasari has a clear position that can be seen
clearly in the Law No. 11 Year 2008 on ITE Article 5, paragraph 1 to 4, then the
electronic evidence is an extension of the tool existing evidence in civil procedure
law; Secondly, that these considerations to the case of Prita Mulyasari judge
related to electronic information is a consideration that discusses thoroughly the
contents of electronic mail or e-mail Prita Mulyasari or electronic information
which according to the judges on the district court and the High Court is against
the law in accordance with the basis of a lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff, while the
level of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court in a judgment stated that the
action was not proven Prita Mulyasari committed an unlawful act. Third, the
court ruling against Prita Mulyasari not comply with Law No. 11 Year 2008 on
Information and Electronic Transactions that can be seen clearly in all the
considerations and decisions that never entirely referring to Law No. 11 Year
2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions.
Description
Keywords
Electronic information, evidence, verdict, judgment.