ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU PERKARA NOMOR : 139/PDT/G/2011/PN.PBR

dc.contributor.authorPRATIWI, DICHA ARDITA
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-20T02:44:34Z
dc.date.available2013-07-20T02:44:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-20
dc.descriptionDasar pertimbangan putusan hakim dalam perkara Nomor: 139/PDT/G/2011/PN.PBR dan sudut asas kemanfaatan belum mencerminkan terlaksananya asas kemanfaatan, karena amar dan keputusan tidak memberi kepastian hukum apa lagi keadilan, dimana amar keputusannya menolak eksepsi dari Tergugat dan juga menolak gugatan Penggugat untuk seluruhnya.en_US
dc.description.abstractEnforcement of civil procedure is done through a judicial process in the form of a lawsuit or petition. Lawsuit or petition was conducted in the courts as the last bastion. As the last bastion of the court should be able to give you a sense of fairness, certainty and expediency or at least close to the flavor.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unri.ac.id:80/handle/123456789/4577
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectJudges verdicten_US
dc.subjectUnlawful Deedsen_US
dc.titleANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU PERKARA NOMOR : 139/PDT/G/2011/PN.PBRen_US
dc.typestudent Paper Post Degreeen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
JURNAL DICHA ARDITA PRATIWI.pdf
Size:
238.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections