Abstract:
Bureaucracy in Indonesia, both at the central and regional levels, during the New Order under the spotlight and often sharp criticism for his conduct that is incompatible with the duties entrusted as public servants. Therefore, when people talk about the bureaucracy is always a negative connotation. Bureaucracy is slow, convoluted, impede progress, tend to pay attention to the procedure than substance, and inefficient. Related delay implementation of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia, there are several factors that are still an obstacle and a challenge, the lack of commitment and political leadership, The politicization of the bureaucracy, Opposition (resistance) of the bureaucracy itself, The lack of competence in the bureaucracy reform. The purpose of this study was to analyze the Implementation of Reforms in Post-New Order Indonesia and knowing Factors Affecting Reforms in Post-New Order Indonesia. Theory (approach) is used as a tool of analysis in this study is the bureaucratic reform and good governance (good governance). While the methods used in this research is descriptive qualitative research which is intended to provide a systematic overview of the observed phenomena.. Based on this research, Bureaucratic reform happens Barau fall of the regime was not able to produce a meaningful life for the majority of the people of Indonesia. The success of Indonesia to hold democratic elections and form a new government regime has not been able to bring this nation out of the crisis. Community expectations that the new government regime capable of combating KKN (corruption, collusion, nepotism) and form a clean government is still far from realitass. Corrupt practices in government and public services is still ongoing, and even scales and actors are increasingly widespread. People's desire to enjoy public services are efficient, responsive, and accountable is still very far from reality. Influx of new people in the government, both in the legislative or executive, are also not able to create a significant improvement in the performance of government. Many of those caught up in lumput corruption and bureaucracy have contributed to public.
