Abstract:
This research dilatarbelakangi by its low student activity and student studying
result. Severally causal factor it is its reducing variation in learning and tending
learning process one way was caused to learn dominant more mengunakan
methodics discourse. On this paper is presented observing activity learns, student
activity and student studying result via yielding cycles final dry run i. and II..
Activity percentage learns in build learning process with action on meet i. cycle i.
which is 64,28% by good categories, appointment II. percentage 71,42% by good
categories. Meanwhile on cycle II. percentages i. appointment 82,14% by good
peer categories, appointment II. percentage 92,86% good peer categories. Student
activity percentage in build learning process with action on meet i. cycle i. which
is 57,14% by adverse categories, appointment II. percentage 67,85% by categories
just fine. Meanwhile on cycle II. percentages i. appointment 78,57% by good
categories, appointment II. percentage 89,29% good peer categories. Averagely
thoroughness usufructs to study student worked up 7 points of basic score become
66,00 on i. daily dry run, and increasing 17,75 points of i. daily dry runs as 83,75
on daily dry run II
