Abstract:
From my observation and experience X
5
Class in High School N 1 Pangkalan Kerinci in
2012, found that the symptoms are generally most students are less motivated in learning to
follow so the impact on the results of the lessons of history have not reached the 68% of students
KKM established by the school that is 75, teachers generally realize that history is often seen as
less desirable subjects, and boring by most students. Based on those researchers interested in
conducting a study to determine the class action appropriate action to Model Student Learning
Facilitator And Explaining To Improve Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes Lesson In
History Class X
5
In SMA N 1 Pangkalan Kerinci. The objectives of this study are: 1) to
determine the activity history teacher and student activities, 2) to determine the application of the
method Student Facilitator And Explaining the increase in learning motivation and learning
outcomes, 3) to determine the correlation motivation cycle 1 and cycle 2, 4) to determine the
correlation of motivation with learning outcomes. Model Student Facilitator and Explaining
learning, is a model of learning in which students present ideas or opinions on other students.
Classroom action research was conducted in the classroom X
5
In SMA N 1 Pangkalan
Kerinci in 2012 the number of students 32. The study consisted of 2 cycles. The first cycle is the
beginning of the meeting and the first learning process, while the second is a follow-up cycle is
performed in the first act. Based on the survey results revealed that all teachers in the first cycle
obtained an average score of 11 with enough categories, while the second cycle increased by an
average score of 19 categorized well. Student activity cycle I gained score 290 with less
categories and cycle II was increased by an average score of 554 categories. Motivation to learn
first cycle shows that the average score of 628 including enough category, for the second cycle
there was an increase on average in 1022 categories. The results of the first cycle study showed
that the average score of 71,53 including enough categories, and the second cycle of continuous
improvement also occurred on average 84,5 with either category. Motivation for correlation
analysis cycle I was a correlation is 0,432, and the motivation of the second cycle increased to
0.687 indicates a strong positive direction. Pre correlation study results with PTK cycle I score
his average is 0,433 and Pre PTK with the second cycle also increased to 0,907 in which both
these correlations indicate strong direction.
