Abstract:
Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering reversed
burden of proof on to do on offense which includes felonies and has the advantage of the
reversed burden of proof required to prove that defendant's property wealth is not the result of a
criminal act (Article 77), and the Law on Money Laundering allows anyone who holds both the
family and the proceeds of crime can be punished as well as the others in terms of determining
defendant's seizure of assets that have been seized earlier, often experience difficulties in terms
of foreclosure through a civil lawsuit against the defendants or their heirs however, this Act also
has shortcomings and needs to be done as a follow-up to the addition of Article 77 thus proving
to be even more effective reverse
