Abdul, Rahman2013-07-182013-07-182013-07-18http://repository.unri.ac.id:80/handle/123456789/4496Pelaksanaan pencabutan keterangan terdakwa dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru, pada prinsipnya boleh dilakukan oleh terdakwa, dengan syarat pencabutan dilakukan selama pemeriksaan persidangan pengadilan berlangsung dan harus disertai dengan alasan yang mendasar dan logis. Alasan yang mendasar dan logis tersebut mengandung arti bahwa alasan yang menjadi dasar pencabutan tersebut harus dapat dibuktikan kebenarannya dan diperkuat atau didukung oleh bukti-bukti lain yang menunjukkan bahwa alasan pencabutan tersebut benar dan dapat dibuktikan oleh hakim.In the trial in the District Court found the defendant Pekanbaru often revoked rendered outside the hearing or testimony he gave to investigators in the investigation examination contained in the Minutes of Investigation (BAP). Where such information is generally contained confessions accused of any criminal offense indicted him. The reason is often used as the basis of the revocation is that at the time appear before the investigator, the defendants forced or threatened with violence both physically and psychologically to acknowledge the crimes charged to him. Cursory impressed that the revocation terms easy to understand and easy to do. However, in reality it is not so as it turns out in practice at the revocation hearing so much cause problems. Especially regarding the judge's assessment of the defendant's reason for deleting the information.enRevocationEvidencestudent Paper Post Degree