Abstract:
In the trial in the District Court found the defendant Pekanbaru often revoked rendered
outside the hearing or testimony he gave to investigators in the investigation examination
contained in the Minutes of Investigation (BAP). Where such information is generally
contained confessions accused of any criminal offense indicted him. The reason is often used
as the basis of the revocation is that at the time appear before the investigator, the defendants
forced or threatened with violence both physically and psychologically to acknowledge the
crimes charged to him. Cursory impressed that the revocation terms easy to understand and
easy to do. However, in reality it is not so as it turns out in practice at the revocation hearing
so much cause problems. Especially regarding the judge's assessment of the defendant's
reason for deleting the information.
Description:
Pelaksanaan pencabutan keterangan terdakwa dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan
Negeri Pekanbaru, pada prinsipnya boleh dilakukan oleh terdakwa, dengan
syarat pencabutan dilakukan selama pemeriksaan persidangan pengadilan
berlangsung dan harus disertai dengan alasan yang mendasar dan logis. Alasan
yang mendasar dan logis tersebut mengandung arti bahwa alasan yang menjadi
dasar pencabutan tersebut harus dapat dibuktikan kebenarannya dan diperkuat
atau didukung oleh bukti-bukti lain yang menunjukkan bahwa alasan
pencabutan tersebut benar dan dapat dibuktikan oleh hakim.
