Educational History

Permanent URI for this collection

https://repository.unri.ac.id/handle/123456789/119

Browse

Browsing Educational History by Subject "Contextual Teaching and Learning Model learnings (CTL)"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Penggunaan model pembelajaran contextual teaching and learning (CTL) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran sejarah di kelas VIIA SMPN 03 Kec. Kuantan hilir kab. Kuantan singingi
    (2013-05-20) Dedi
    Based on information from education teacher at Junior High School 03 District History. Downstream Kuantan, that student learning outcomes in subjects History is still relatively low at only 30% per cent of students achieving grades A VII class KKM (minimum completeness criteria) is 75, more than that 70% of student learning outcomes is still below value or not achieve KKM (Complete Minimal criteria) that has been set. This happens often caused because the students in the classroom is always sleepy, less eager to learn, ask lazy, less attention when the teacher explains the lesson, as well as his lack of response from students.Classroom Action Research (CAR) aims to determine the improvement of student learning outcomes in the subjects of History at Junior High School 03 class VIIa district. Hilir Regency Kuantan. Kuansing FY 2012/2013 semester using learning model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL). The experiment was conducted on March 4, until 30 April 2013. Number of students in the study of 27 people (13 male students and 14 female students). Parameter study is teacher activity, student activity and learning outcomes (mastery learning absorption and students). The results showed that the average number of teachers in the first cycle activity was 19.5% with a category (good), the second cycle increased to 25% with categories (very good). The average number of students for activities throughout the entire activity in the first cycle was 483.5% (good), the second cycle increased to 639.5% (very good). Absorption results in the form of student learning and mastery learning students, in the first cycle, the first post-test 76.48% (excellent) on the post test II in creased to 79.90% (excellent) with daily test 79.26% (excellent). While in the second cycle, post test III 79.81% (excellent) on the post-test IV increased to 88.15% (excellent) with daily test II 91.67% (excellent). Mastery learning students first cycle was 81.48% and the second