Abstract:
Problems occurred regarding the customary land is already occurring at the beginning of the opening of the land that made the PTPN V company because the absence of an adequate indemnity received by the local community. Then plus the addition of business use rights (HGU) companies without any intervention of indigenous villages and the Government of the tandun village. And the appearance of the conflicts also from Memmorandum of understanding (MOU) or an agreement opening the land for the people's specially for core plantations (PIR sus) tapung vol. 2 primary cooperative credit pattern members (KKPA) was not fulfill. Which is in the MOU, the PTPN V Sei tapung opened a palm plantation with a pattern of KKPA 2300 Ha. But now it is realised by the PTPN V Sei tapung is covering an area of 700 Ha. Although the status of communal land seen from legal spectacles formal was not recognized yet. practically still customary land is inseparable from the life of society Research methods used in this research is qualitative method which means finding the facts as much as possible and then taken a conclusion. Qualitative research mean also illustrates and describes the State of the subject or the object of researchers (institution, society, region, etc.), at the moment it is now based on the facts that appear to be or as it should be. The research was conducted in the Tandun village, sub-district of tandun Rokan hulu. Based on the results of research conducted in field, local governments of rokan hulu have not seriously responded to the problems of this conflict yet. the Government area of rokan hulu recently limited promises will form a team to finish the problem faced by the villagers tandun. Properly local governments should swiftly within provides solutions and create a policy against conflicts that occur on Customary lands in rokan hulu area in order to ensure the welfare of the community
